Najib Penjenayah Glokal?

Aku tanak tulis pepanjang. Bukan sebab aku takut butang blekberi bold aku lekang sebab masih dalam mode menciwi, tapi sebab apa yang aku nak tulis ni adalah ulangan daripada apa yang pernah aku tulis sebelum ini.

Tentang kes Altantuya dan Malaysia.

Tiada sebarang kompromi lagi bahawa, sepertimana saranan mahadet, najib harus membersihkan namanya yang teruk dilibas oleh media, pembangkang, dan juga khalayak antarabangsa yang masih belum berpuas hati dengan caranya menepis isu Altantuya ini.

Terbaru, video tentang cerita ceriti perihal Rosmah pula dibangkitkan dalam Youtube - Perempuan Puaka. Walaupun kurang jelas, tetapi di akhir video adik rosmah menggambarkan seolah2 kakaknya terlibat dalam pembunuhan Altantuya. Kepada yang belum menonton video tersebut, sila ke laman youtube dan cari "perempuan puaka"

Kata dua amat mudah, buktikan di luar keraguan munasabah bahawa rosmah dan lakinya tidak terlibat langsung, atau letak jawatan! Masa depan Tanah Melayu tidak boleh digadaikan oleh pemimpin yang berkemungkinan mempunyai fail2 jenayah dan bermasalah yang boleh digunakan oleh agen-agen negara luar untuk memblackmail Malaysia bagi kepentingan mereka!

Ini masa depan negara. Kita sekarang berhadapan dengan pemimpin yang bukan sahaja dituduh mempunyai jenayah lokal, tetapi juga global! Pemimpin Jenayah GLOKAL! Ekonomi dan kemakmuran negara sekarang bergantung sepenuhnya pada PM yang sampai sekarang dilihat begitu lemah dan penuh dengan tanda soal. Rakyat Malaysia terus risau dengan perkembangan ini dan melihat masa depan Malaysia yang kemungkinan besar akan dijajah semula oleh negara luar.

Najib, letak jawatan atau bertarung membersihkan nama kamu dalam kandang tertuduh di mahkamah. Buktikan bahawa kamu langsung tidak ada kena mengena dalam hal ini. Ini bukan lagi masalah peribadi rumahtangga kamu, tetapi telah menjadi isu yang mampu mengancam keselamatan, hala tuju dan kemakmuran negara.

Rakyat Malaysia, sila sedar dengan ancaman yang kita hadapi sekarang bahawa Perdana Menteri kita berkemungkinan besar tidak mampu membuat keputusan yang rasional kerana berhadapan dengan tekanan negara luar yang mungkin mempunyai bukti lebih hebat daripada Bala ataupun Raja Petra!

Kita semua telah diberi amaran.

Najib : Belum lawan dah banyak alasan!

Jadi, secara tiba2 pilihanraya menyusahkan rakyat? Laki si Rosmah dan seluruh menteri2 kabinet Ikea hari ni secara bersatu hati mengatakan bahawa pilihanraya menyusahkan rakyat dan membuang masa. Sekali dengaq macam orang takut pun ada.

Kenapa laki si Rosmah ni kata pilihanraya menyusahkan dan membuang masa? Apa pulak kaitan pilihanraya dan buat kerja urus ekonomi negara? Yang nak bertanding nanti bukannya Negara, bukannya Parlimen. Yang nak mengundi nanti cuma rakyat kat satu ADUN saja. Apa yang nak kalut sangat?

Ekonomi? Hang dok la pejabat PM nanti buat kerja. Dok kalut turun kempen buat apa? Bukan tempat Mat Yakob yang nak bertanding ni. Bukan Zeti yang nak jadi calon. Bukannya duit kempen mai dari MARA ataupun kerajaan. Buat la kerja urus ekonomi. Pasaipa nak gelabah marah2 tuduh pilihanraya ni berunsur politik?

Lagipun dengan adanya pilihanraya kecik ni secara tak langsung menggalakkan pelancongan domestik. Merancakkan ekonomi setempat. Dan dapat mempromosikan kawasan2 terpencil kepada dunia luar. Nah, apa yang nak dirisaukan dengan ekonomi?

Menyusahkan rakyat? Sapa yang suruh buat pilihanraya pada masa orang bekerja? Buatla hari cuti. Nak lagi senang, buat 1 Mei nanti - hari pekerja. Sapa pun tak susah nak lari keluaq pejabat pi mengundi. Kalau kata sesak lalulintas sebab dok buat ceramah, bagi la semua parti masuk tivi. Buat debat dalam tu. Bagi permit penyiaran untuk ceramah time tu. Bagi masuk radio. Bagi ruang dalam paper. Kurang la ceramah. Lapang la jalan. Apa masalahnya?

Membazir duit? Kurangkanlah lori dan trak FRU yang mai dok bagi gempaq orang kampung. Lagipun ni cuma ADUN, bukannya Parlimen. Tempat pun besaq kelemboi saja. Bazir banyak mana sangat?

So, apa masalahnya sekarang? Aku tak nampak masalah pun. Yang nampak ialah alasan. Dan orang penakut memang banyak cari alasan untuk tamau lawan.

Penakut ka? Sudah pasti. Sebab kalau berani, takkan mudah2 boleh jadi Perdana Menteri?

Hehehe

Lima Kupang: Antara 60 biliyon dan santapan tengahari

Oleh Matkeri

Laki Rosmah bentang bajet 60 biliyon! Tapi orang dok sibuk tanya sapa makan tengahari ngan Paklah tadi? Hahaha

Bab makan tengahari Paklah, Anwar, dan Syeikh Mahmud, itu kita biaq para Nostradamus telek dalam timba. Apa yang depa besembang selama sejam sebelum masing2 balik ke Parlimen tersenyum riang, gua no komen. Timba ada ayaq, cuma tadak limau purut nak kacau dengan jari telunjuk. Dok nampak icon kertas koyak saja.

Anyway, aku cuma nak sentuh bab bajet laki Rosmah. 60bilion bukan sikit. Rasanya itulah angka yang akan diprint untuk headline paper pagi besok. Banyakkk.

Ada beberapa komen dari rakyat bangang macam aku di bawah ni. Pertamanya, adakah anak Pak Tam Kob aku yang baru kena buang kerja dari kilang di Penang sebulan lepas akan diambil bekerja sebagai pekerja kontrak membaiki dan membina bangunan2 sekolah seperti yang telah diumumkan? Atau adakah kontraktor2 ini masih dan akan terus menggaji pekerja dari indon dan bangla?

Keduanya, dalam bajet stimulus, laki rosmah ada menyatakan bahawa seratus juta diperuntukkan untuk buat jejantas dan bumbung pejalan kaki kat kawasan strategik dan segitiga emas. Selama tempoh menyiapkan jejantas dan bumbung, apakah jaminan kerajaan agar jalan tu tak jam dan kelewatan orang macam aku sampai ke tempat kerja sebab jam orang tutup sebelah jalan tak dijadikan alasan oleh bos untuk bagi notis sebab "tak menepati masa". Dan kalau aku kena buang, adakah DBKL akan kejar aku dan halau aku kalau aku terpaksa berbusker di bawah bumbung baru untuk mengemis dari pelancong2 yang rata2nya sangat ramai dan kedekut di situ?

Dan yang last, laki Rosmah juga berkata 10 sekolah swasta akan didirikan dan BUKAN bertujuan untuk buat duit. Jika swasta tak buat duit, adakah ia masih dipanggil swasta, atau dipanggil "Public Welfare"? Jika Public Welfare, apakah kriteria yang menjadikan 10 sekolah tadi sebagai "sekolah swasta"? Adakah swasta dan walfare sudah hilang garis pemisahnya? Adakah itu sebabnya kerajaan sekarang dah tak tau mana satu yang patut diberi, dan mana satu yang patut diniagakan? Adakah laki Rosmah makan nasik kandar kuah kari terlebih kas2 masa menulis bajet?

Adussss

So, macamana? Orang macam aku cuma dapat pengecualian cukai ATAS FAEDAH yang dikenakan pada rumah yang dah dibeli. Banyak mana? Cukupla untuk save beli baju pagoda baru lagi dua lai untuk tahun ni. PTPTN? Kot la nak dengaq "kerajaan jugak akan memansuhkan bunga pinjaman selama tiga tahun" ka, hapa kaa. Haram. Subsidi pengangkutan awam untuk orang yang ghagaih LRT dan bas macam aku ni? Hampehs. Tol diturunkan lagi? Jangan harap! "Untuk menggalakkan urusniaga atas talian, kerajaan juga melalui syarikat TM akan menurunkan 50% harga langganan internet" hanya akan disebut bila aku jadi menteri kewangan. Setakat sekarang, laki Rosmah lebih selesa memastikan semua kontraktor2 yang terdiri dari ketua bahagian dan cawangan dan kumpulan G7 (ka G6?) dapat survive untuk mengundi perwakilan2 yang telah dicaturkan.

Rakyat kebanyakan macam kita ni, sekali lagi dipinggirkan. 60biliyon. Berapa sen aku dapat? Dua lai baju Pagoda. Saya sayang Malaysia!

http://www.jahilgoblog.net

Antara pemimpin berani dan yang takut bini

Ringgit dah cecah 3.50 berbanding US Dollar pada bulan ini. Dua bulan terlebih awal dari jangkaan gomen kita. Aku dah nampak Najib berkerut dahi antara nak tambat dengan tak tambat ringgit kali ni. Dalam masa yang sama, sedang Pak Lah jadi menteri kewangan bulan lepas, dia dengan konfiden mengunjurkan pertumbuhan ekonomi sebanyak 5%. Disokong dengan bongkaknya oleh mat yakkob.

Sebulan lepas, ekonomi Malaysia menunjukkan kekonfidenan yang boleh dikawal. Walaupun semua bursa terjun tiruk, termasuk pelabur yang pacak kepala dari tingkat 20, Malaysia masih lagi bongkak mengatakan ekonomi kita masih “mapan” dan “utuh” di bawah kerajaan yang tak dapat mandat 2/3 nih. Kalau ada “sedikit” kekalutan pun, bukan disebabkan oleh ketidakcekapan gomen, atau gangguan pasaran global, tapi sebaliknya dek kerana ketua pembangkang kita, Anwar Ibrahim yang katanya “menakutkan” pelabur.



Laporan ekonomi dalam tivi juga agak lawak. Dalam melapurkan pasaran bursa dunia yang jatuh dalam angka peratusan, tapi bila tiba laporan bursa Malaysia, ia dilapurkan dalam bentuk perpuluhan. Sunggo aneh.

Tapi harini lain pulak ceritanya. Gomen terpaksa akur bahawa depa tak dapat tipu rakyat sampai bila2. Bila indeks nikkei jatuh sampai 11%, gomen akur dan terpaksa mengumumkan pengendutan ekonomi daripada 5% kepada 3%.

Kesimpulannya? Malaysia sama2 terjun tiruk. Ekonomi kita makin teruk. Dan tahun depan semua kena start makan jeruk. Semua kena belajaq ikat perut.

Apakah punca semua ni sebenarnya. Mudah, back to basic. Kembali kepada yang asas. Bila kita bercakap tentang ekonomi (ekonomoney?) ni, tak boleh tidak, kita mesti kena becakap tentang asas yang menjana ekonomi tu sendiri : persepsi rakyat. Persepsi rakyat terhadap kerajaan. Persepsi rakyatlah sebenarnya yang menyumbang kepada kembang kuncupnya ekonomi dalam negara. Itulah sebenarnya asas kepada ekonomi sesebuah negara.

Jika rakyat yakin kerajaan yang ada itu kuat, maka kuatlah ekonominya. Jika rakyat rasa kerajaan itu lemah, maka lemahlah ekonominya.

Persepsi rakyat

Tanya semua rakyat yang ada sekarang, samada yang tengah meeting pilih perwakilan, atau yang kutip tin tepi jalan, yakinkah mereka dengan perdana menteri yang ada sekarang? Pak Lah? Yakinkah kita pada ghentua sorang ni? Silap2 kita pulak kena mintak diri sebab tak larat dengaq depa beletiaq tak puas hati.

Nah, lepas tu tanya pulak tentang “bakal perdana menteri” kita nanti. Mampukah Malaysia bangun di bawah pemerintahan Najib dan bini? Aku gerenti sebelum sempat aku habiskan taip ayat tadi korang dah bejuih2 bibir mulut sambil mengeluh “huh”!

Negara rasuah menghasilkan rakyat yang resah. Pemimpin yang lemah menghasilkan rakyat yang gelisah! Rakyat yang resah dan gelisah akan hidup dalam kebimbangan. Dan rakyat yang berada di dalam kebimbangan akan cuba sedaya upaya untuk menjaga masa depan mereka dengan mengumpul harta dan tidak berbelanja!

Macamana rakyat nak berbelanja jika depa tau pemimpin atasan tak cekap urus ekonomi? Atau rakyat tau yang perdana menteri masa itu dikelola oleh bini yang mengukur kejayaan seseorang berdasar kepada kembang rambut, atau jumlah almari kasut? Duit terpaksa disimpan takut2 dibuang kerja. Bila duit simpan bekepuk sebab nak jaga masa depan, produk melambak di pasaran tadak orang nak beli. Bila produk tadak orang beli, majikan terpaksa jual murah. Bila jual murah, untung kurang. Bila untung kurang, hutang tak boleh bayaq. Bila hutang tak boleh bayaq, bank ligan. Bila bank ligan tak boleh bayaq, meniaga tutup kedai. Bila kedai tutup, pekerja kena buang, tadak pendapatan, bank pun rugi sebab tadapat duit hutang. Bila pekerja kena buang, duit nak belanja makin tadak. Bila nak belanja tadak, lebih banyak perniagaan gulung tikar sebab barang tak laku. Lebih susut duit kat bank sebab lebih ramai tak bayar hutang.

Rumah tak boleh beli sebab bank tadak duit nak bagi hutang. Kereta tak boleh beli sebab bank serik nak bagi hutang. Sektor besar akan merudum, sektor kecik apatah lagi. Ekonomi akan lebih gawat, rakyat akan lebih gayat, akhirnya semua merana!

Pasai apa?

Pasai rakyat tak yakin pada kepimpinan yang ada. Rakyat tak yakin pada pak lah untuk kendali ekonomi, atau pada najib yang diperintah bini. Kalau rakyat yakin pada pemerintah, rakyat lebih konfiden tentang masa depan. Jika rakyat yakin pada masa depan, rakyat tak kisah untuk bershoping sakan. Dan jika rakyat bershoping sakan, lebih untung perniagaan, lebih banyak produk ditawarkan, lebih banyak peluang pekerjaan, lebih jenuh syarikat bagi bonus dan habuan, lebih kerap orang bayaq hutang, lebih senang bank nak bagi pinjaman, lebih senang hati semua orang!

Ekonomi negara digerakkan oleh persepsi rakyat. Itulah asas ekonomi kapitalis yang kita kendong selama ini.

Jika kita terus diperintah oleh kerajaan yang korup, pemimpin yg lemah dan perasuah, sistem yang tiada integriti, yang terus2an membimbangkan rakyat dan pelabur, bersedialah kita untuk menghadapi masa depan yang lebih kelam.

Tetapi jika kita terus menyokong sebarang usaha untuk membetulkan keadaan, menolak kerajaan yang korup dan zalim dengan apa cara sekalipun yang dibenarkan oleh perlembagaan dan undang2 demi untuk memulihkan keyakinan rakyat terhadap kerajaan, insyaAllah masa depan akan lebih cerah dan gemilang.

So, sekarang ni terpulang kepada korang. Samada nak mula belajaq makan ubi kayu, atau nak mula berangan beli rumah baru.

Bala tarik balik SD

Oleh Malaysiakini

Balasubramaniam juga mempunyai peguam yang baru. Peguam Americk Sidhu, yang bersamanya semalam, juga tidak tahu apa yang sedang berlaku. Sidang akhbar Balasubramaniam masih berjalan.


Penyiasat persendirian, P Balasubramaniam membuat kejutan lagi apabila menarik balik akuan berkanunnya yang mengaitkan Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak dengan Altantuya Shaariibuu.

Dalam akuan berkanunnya itu, Balasubramaniam mendakwa Najib mempunya hubungan seksual dengan Altantuya. Najib juga didakwa memperkenalkan Altantuya kepada Abdul Razak Baginda.

Balasubramaniam berkata, beliau telah dipaksa membuat akuan berkanun tersebut. Dalam satu sidang akhbar di sebuah hotel di Kuala Lulmpu pagi ini, Balasubramaniam membuat akuan berkanun yang baru.

Akuan berkanun yang baru itu tanpa rujukan Najib mempunyai hubungan seksual dengan Altantuya ataupun Najib yang memperkenalkan Abdul Razak baginda kepada wanita Mongolia tersebut.

Balasubramaniam juga mempunyai peguam yang baru. Peguam Americk Sidhu, yang bersamanya semalam, juga tidak tahu apa yang sedang berlaku. Sidang akhbar Balasubramaniam masih berjalan.

Semalam, Balasubramaniam membuat pendedahan yang menggemparkan bahawa beliau telah mendengar dari Abdul Razak mengenai hubungan Najib dengan Altantuya.

Tetapi hari ini beliau berkata, beliau mahu menarik balik akuan berkanunnya pertama, yang difailnya pada 1 Julai, dan menggantikannya dengan yang baru, yang diumumkannya hari ini.

"Saya mahu menarik balik akuan berkanun yang pertama," katanya sambil menambah, beliau dipaksa membuat akuan berkanun tersebut.

Balasubramaniam telah diupah oleh Abdul Razak untuk menguruskan Altantuya pada 2006 yang mengganggu Abdul Razak, yang juga rapat dengan Najib.

PI: Najib ada hubungan seks dengan Altantuya

“Najib Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse,” kata Balasubramaniam dalam akuan bersumpahnya yang difailkan pada 1 hb Julai 2008.


Dalam akuan bersumpah yang didedahkan oleh Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak dikatakan bukan sahaja mengenali Altantuya malahan pernah mengadakan hubungan seks dengan wanita warga Monggolia tersebut.

Akuan bersumpah yang cukup menggemparkan itu dibuat oleh Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal iaitu penyiasat persendirian yang diupah oleh Abdul Razak Baginda yang tertuduh di dalam kes pembunuhan tragis Altantuya.

“Najib Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse,” kata Balasubramaniam dalam akuan bersumpahnya yang difailkan pada 1 hb Julai 2008.

Dengan sendirinya akuan bersumpah ini menolak penafian Najib yang berkali-kali menafikannya.

Lihat pengakuan bersumpah secara penuh di bawah ini (diambil dari Malaysiakini):

I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal ... do solemly and sincerely declare as follows:

1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force, having joined as a constable in 1981 attached to the police field force. I was then promoted to the rank of lance corporal and finally resigned from the police force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.

2. I have been working as a freelance private investigator since I left the police force.

3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang between the hours of 8am to 5pm each working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.

4. I resigned from this job after 2½ days as I was not receiving any proper instructions.

5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the Oct 5, 2006 as he had apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaaribuu.

6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of Altantuya Shaaribuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.

7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaaribuu had been given some powers by a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of this.

8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.

9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused to do so as he informed me there were some high-profile people involved.

10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaaribuu was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in Mongolia.

11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed and his daughter harassed.

12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as well.

13. On Oct 9, 2006 I received a phone call from Abdul Razak Baginda at about 9.30am informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later. Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some Hotel Malaya notepaper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.

14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.

15. These three Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day at about 12 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.

16. On Oct 11, 2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak Baginda showed me the note which basically asked him to call her urgently.

17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he declined as he felt she would have to return to Mongolia as soon as her cash ran out.

18. In the meantime, I had arranged for Suras to perform surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these three Mongolian girls, but they recognised him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.

19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.

20. On the Oct 14, 2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights when I was not there. Abdul Razak Baginda called me on my handphone to inform me of this so I rushed back to his house. As I arrived, I noticed Aminah outside the front gates shouting “Razak, bastard, come out from the house”. I tried to calm her down but couldn’t, so I called the police who arrived in two patrol cars. I explained the situation to the police, who took her away to the Brickfields police station.

21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police report but they refused.

22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own private investigator, one Mr Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for US$500,000 and three tickets to Mongolia, apparently as commission owed to Aminah from a deal in Paris.

23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.

24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.

25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that:

1) He had been introduced to Aminah by Najib Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.

2) Najib Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.

3) Najib Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the deputy prime minister.

4) Najib Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in Paris.

5) Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a US$500,000 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris.

26. On Oct 19, 2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights to begin my night duty. I had parked my car outside as usual. I saw a yellow Proton Perdana taxi pass by with three ladies inside, one of whom was Aminah. The taxi did a U-turn and stopped in front of the house where these ladies rolled down the window and wished me ‘Happy Deepavali’. The taxi then left.

27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received an SMS from Razak instructing me “to delay her until my man comes”.

28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following:

1) That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Najib Razak.
2) That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Najib Razak at a dinner in Paris.

3) That she was promised a sum of US$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a submarine deal in Paris.

4) That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.

5) That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment.

6) That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in Korea as her mother is Korean whilst her father was a Mongolian/Chinese mix.

7) That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda, would I be able to arrange for her to see Najib Razak.

29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red Proton Aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be lance corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plainclothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.

30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said “Yes”. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue Proton Saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The drivers window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.

31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red Proton and exchanged seats so that lance corporal Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.

32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.

33. After Oct 19, 2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7pm to 8am the next morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called ‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.

34. On the night of Oct 20, 2006, both of Aminah’s girlfriends turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed them she had been arrested the night before.

35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr Ang and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in the house.

36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi police station who was in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls, I believe was Amy.

37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling handphone and I was to pass the phone to the inspector from Dang Wangi police station.

38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi inspector. The conversation lasted 3-4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the next day.

39. On or about Oct 24, 2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me to accompany him to the Brickfields police station as he had been advised to lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these Mongolian girls.

40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going to Thailand to lodge a report with the Mongolian consulate there regarding Aminah’s disappearance. Apparently she had sent the same SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda. This is why he told me he had been advised to lodge a police report.

41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the criminal division, Brickfields police station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.

42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at Brickfields police station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumbdrive. I know that this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.

43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my statement instead and so I did.

44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on Oct 26, 2006 as this was the day he left for Hong Kong on his own.

45. In mid-November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When I arrived there I was immediately arrested under Section 506 of the Penal Code for criminal intimidation.

46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for five days. On the third day, I was released on police bail.

47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I arrived, I was told I was being arrested under Section 302 of the Penal Code for murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for seven days.

48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on Oct 19, 2006 which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.

49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 am to 6pm everyday for seven consecutive days. I told them all I knew including everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships with Najib Razak but when I came to sign my statement, these details had been left out.

50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Najib Razak or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC for Najib Razak and/or his wife.

51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30am. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Najib Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.

52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30am, Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Najib Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows: “ I am seeing IGP at 11am today … matter will be solved … be cool”.

53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.

54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to:

1) State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

2) Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the three accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

3) Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions case.

4) Emphasise the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police Force for 17 years, I am absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.

5) Express my concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.

55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.

Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal
July 1, 2008

Najib: Polis ambil kenyataan Rosmah

Oleh: Muda Mohd Noor (Malaysiakini)

Perbuatan Raja Petra itu tidak boleh diterima. Sebab apa yang dia nyatakan itu adalah sesuatu yang tidak betul.

Timbalan perdana menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak hari ini menafikan bahawa isterinya Rosmah Mansor terbabit dalam pembunuhan Altantuya Shaariibuu seperti yang didakwa oleh Raja Petra Kamarudin.

Najib juga berkata, Rosmah telah dipanggil memberi kenyataan kepada polis ekoran dakwaan terbaru dalam akuan bersumpah penulis sensasi itu.

Bercakap kepada pemberita di Parlimen hari ini, Najib berkata akuan Raja Petra itu satu pembohongan semata-mata.

Najib juga menyifatkannya sebagai satu tindakan terdesak untuk mencemarkan imej politik beliau.

Sebelum ini, beliau mempengerusikan mesyuarat jawatankuasa kabinet mengenai masalah pendatang tanpa izin di Sabah.

Raja Petra, dalam akuan bersumpahnya 18 Jun lalu, mendakwa Rosmah bersama dua lagi berada di tempat kejadian sebelum wanita Mongolia itu diletupkan.

Najib dan isterinya beberapa kali menafikan pembabitan mereka dengan kes ini, yang masih dalam perbicaraan di Mahkamah Tinggi Shah Alam.

Pengendali blog Malaysia Today juga mendakwa perdana menteri menerima maklumat tentang pembabitan tiga individu itu, termasuk Rosmah, dan menyerahkan laporan perisikan kepada menantunya dan juga naib ketua Pemuda Umno, Khairy Jamaluddin.

Bagaimanapun, semalam, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi menafikan ada menerima laporan bertulis daripada perisikan tentera mengenai mereka yang terlibat dalam kes pembunuhan Altantuya.

Abdullah dilaporkan berkata: "Memang saya concern (dengan dakwaan Raja Petra).

"Perbuatan Raja Petra itu tidak boleh diterima. Sebab apa yang dia nyatakan itu adalah sesuatu yang tidak betul.

"Terutamanya dalam surat itu (akuan berkanun Raja Petra) disebut yang saya dah diberi satu laporan mengenainya dari pihak perisikan tentera.

"Itu tak betul," katanya kepada pemberita selepas mempengerusikan jawatankuasa khas mempertingkatkan daya saing kelapa sawit di bangunan Parlimen.

Jutawan segera buat pemenang emas Olimpik

Oleh: Malaysiakini

Atlit negara yang memenangi pingat emas di Sukan Olimpik di Beijing Ogos ini dan di temasya serupa di masa akan datang, akan menerima insentif RM1 juta berbanding hanya RM160,000 sebelum ini.

Atlit negara yang memenangi pingat emas di Sukan Olimpik di Beijing Ogos ini dan di temasya serupa di masa akan datang, akan menerima insentif RM1 juta berbanding hanya RM160,000 sebelum ini.

Timbalan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak berkata, walaupun hadiah itu dianggap besar, tetapi ianya wajar memandangkan standard Sukan Olimpik semakin meningkat.

"Untuk memenangi pingat emas ini juga bukanlah satu perkara yang mudah kerana pertandingan di Olimpik semakin sukar. Daripada satu Olimpik kepada Olimpik yang satu lagi, kita lihat standard semakin meningkat.

"Oleh itu kita haruslah meletakkan sasaran yang lebih besar, lebih menarik lagi," katanya selepas mempengerusikan mesyuarat Jawatankuasa Kabinet Pembangunan Sukan di ibunegara.

Menurut laporan Bernama, Najib berkata negara-negara jiran juga seperti Singapura menawarkan insentif S$1 juta untuk atlit mereka yang meraih emas di temasya Olimpik.

Beliau berkata ganjaran RM1 juta adalah wajar dan berpatutan memandangkan temasya Sukan Olimpik itu "begitu gah" dan diadakan empat tahun sekali.

Najib berkata mesyuarat juga bersetuju untuk memberikan RM300,000 kepada pemenang pingat perak, dan RM100,000 untuk gangsa.

Bagi pasukan yang memenangi emas pula, kadar minimum yang ditentukan ialah RM150,000 untuk setiap pemain.

Pencen dinaikkan

Selain itu pencen bulanan yang diterima oleh pemenang pingat di Sukan Olimpik juga dinaikkan daripada RM3,000 kepada RM5,000 bagi pemenang pingat emas, RM3,000 bagi pingat perak (sebelum ini RM1,500) dan RM2,000 bagi gangsa (sebelum ini RM1,000).

Ia berkuatkuasa mulai bulan depan.

Buat masa ini hanya lima atlit negara yang pernah memenangi pingat di Sukan Olimpik iaitu pasangan beregu lelaki badminton negara Razif dan Jailani Sidek (pingat gangsa di Sukan Olimpik Barcelona pada 1992), pasangan regu lelaki Cheah Soon Kit-Yap Kim Hock (perak di Sukan Olimpik Atlanta pada 1996) dan pemain perseorangan Rashid Sidek (gangsa juga di Olimpik Atlanta).

Najib berkata jawatankuasa itu juga bersetuju untuk memberikan insentif wang tunai kepada atlit paralimpik negara iaitu RM300,000 (emas), RM200,000 (perak) dan RM100,000 (gangsa).

Katanya jawatankuasa itu mahu supaya skuad elit negara diberi penekanan dengan latihan yang dapat melahirkan kekuatan mental pada setiap peringkat latihan mereka.

"Kita dapati ini salah satu faktor yang membezakan antara pasukan dan individu yang menang dan yang berjaya. Kita melihat memang atlit kita dalam beberapa jenis seukan sudah mencecah tahap dunia tetapi perbezaan antara kemenangan dan sebaliknya adalah kekuatan mental.

"Kekuatan mental kita ini tidak seperti mana yang boleh menjamin kejayaan dalam keadaan kita menghadapi saingan yang begitu sengit sekali," katanya.

Mengenai penubuhan pusat latihan sukan berprestasi tinggi yang sebelum ini dicadangkan di London tetapi terpaksa dibatal, Najib berkata penubuhan pusat dengan konsep serupa tetap dilaksana.

"Tidak semestinya di United Kingdom tetapi akan dibuat di mana-mana negara. Kita ada fleksibiliti dan kita akan cari tempat itu yang disokong dengan kepakaran sains sukan untuk menentukan atlit kita bukan saja dapat mengambil bahagian pada peringkat yang tertinggi tetapi juga dapat faedah daripada penggunaan sains sukan," katanya.

Najib's aide: "It's mind boggling!"

Oleh: Beh Lih Yi (Malaysiakini)

"My informer states that Aziz was the person who placed the C4 on various parts of Altantuya’s body witnessed by Rosmah and Norhayati."



Jun 20, 08 7:15pm

"It's mindboggling!" - That's how Raja Petra Kamarudin's statutory declaration alleging that Deputy Prime Minister Najib's wife was at the murder scene of Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu was described today.

An aide to Najib Abdul Razak also said they were aware of this latest claim made by Raja Petra, who also runs the 'Malaysia Today' website.

"At the moment, we are looking into it. This is a very mind-boggling statutory declaration," Najib's press secretary Tengku Sarifuddin Tengku Ahmad told Malaysiakini.

The latest allegation hurled at Rosmah Mansor was made by well-known blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin via a statutory declaration signed at the Kuala Lumpur High Court on Wednesday.

Tengku Sarifuddin however refused to comment if any action could be taken against Raja Petra.

Najib and Rosmah (left) have repeatedly denied they are linked to the killing of Altantuya, describing the widely-known allegations was nothing more than ‘slander and concocted stories’.

In his latest bombshell, Raja Petra accused Rosmah as among three individuals who were present when Altantuya was murdered on October 19, 2006.

"I have been reliably informed that between about 10pm on October 19, 2006 and early hours of the following day, the night Altantuya Shaariibuu was murdered, three other people were also present at the scene of crime," he said, according to his two-page statutory declaration.

He named the two other individuals as one acting colonel Aziz Buyong, who is described as ‘a C4 expert’ and the latter’s wife, known only as Norhayati, who is also said to be Rosmah’s aide de camp.

‘A crime not to reveal’

Altantuya’s body is alleged to have been blown up with C4 explosives at a secondary forest in Puncak Alam, Shah Alam. The murder trial is currently ongoing at the Shah Alam High Court.

"My informer states that Aziz was the person who placed the C4 on various parts of Altantuya’s body witnessed by Rosmah and Norhayati," Raja Petra claimed in the document.

"I make this statutory declaration because I have been reliably informed about the involvement of these three people who have thus far not been implicated in the murder nor called as witnesses by the prosecution in the ongoing trial at the Shah Alam High Court.

"I also make this statutory declaration because I am aware that it is a crime not to reveal evidence that may help the police in its investigation of the crime," read the document, which was first posted on the bigdogdotcom blog run by another blogger.

Raja Petra, contacted by Malaysiakini, has confirmed the content of the document.

He further alleged that he has also been ‘reliably informed’ that Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi knows of Najib's (right) wife alleged involvement.

"[...] Abdullah has received a written report from military intelligence confirming what I have revealed and this report was subsequently handed over to his son-in-law Khairy Jamaluddin for safekeeping," he said.

Apart from Abdullah and Khairy, Raja Petra claimed "one of the (Malay) Rulers" has also been briefed about the matter and is fully aware of the allegation.

He said he has agreed not to reveal their names other than mention that the prime minister and his son-in-law have been given a copy of the military intelligence’s report.

Police inaction over report

"The purpose of this statutory declaration is to urge all these parties who have been duly informed and have knowledge of this matter to come forward to reveal the truth so that the police are able to conduct a proper and thorough investigation into the murder of Altantuya.

"And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act, 1960," he said in his declaration.

In the phone interview, Raja Petra explained why he did not lodge a police report on the latest allegation which could lead to a fresh police probe on the Altantuya (left) murder.

The blogger said since there was no action over a police report he had lodged in a separate case in 2001 when he was allegedly beaten up by a high-ranking policeman, "I am not bothered in making a police report".

When asked why the document was posted elsewhere instead of his own 'Malaysia Today' site, he retorted: "Why must it be published on my site?"

Raja Petra was called in for police questioning early last month over an article titled ‘Let’s send the Altantuya murderers to hell’ in which he implicated Najib and Rosmah in the high-profile murder case.

A close aide to Najib, political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda and two police special operations force personnel have been charged with the murder of the Mongolian national.

All three have pleaded not guilty for the ongoing trial. They face the death sentence should they be found guilty.